Darmanin Calls for Tougher Sentencing After PSG Victory Riots

In the wake of violent incidents during the celebrations of PSG’s Champions League victory, Justice Minister Gérald Darmanin is calling for a radical overhaul of sentencing laws to better respond to today’s criminality. In a statement posted on X on Tuesday, June 3, he argued that recent convictions—particularly for attacks on law enforcement and property damage—are “no longer commensurate with the level of violence our country is experiencing.”

Darmanin is urging a significant legislative shift: scrapping suspended sentences and mandatory sentence adjustments, and introducing mandatory minimum sentences upon a guilty verdict. Among his proposals: at least three months of actual prison time for any assault on a public official, and very steep fines for destruction of property. He believes such changes would uphold judicial independence while addressing public demand for greater firmness.

Suspended Sentences for Four Defendants Despite Calls for Tougher Justice

On Monday, June 2, four individuals arrested during the unrest were tried in immediate appearance court for firing fireworks at police officers. All were sentenced to suspended prison terms ranging from two to eight months, along with fines and mandatory civic training. The court considered their young age, lack of prior convictions, and apologies made in court. Separately, two other individuals received prison sentences for acts of property damage.

A Need for Penalties Suited to Contemporary Crime

The minister emphasized the need for “a firm, simple, and truly adapted sentencing scale” to meet current security challenges. He also floated the idea of replacing suspended sentences with a probation system that combines several alternative measures—such as community service, electronic monitoring, and judicial supervision—thus maintaining judicial discretion.

This push for reform predates the PSG celebrations: on May 12, Darmanin had already sent a four-page letter to all judges in France urging a tougher approach to growing violence. His team has indicated that new legislation could be introduced soon, either as a government bill or a parliamentary initiative supported by multiple political factions.

Striking a Balance Between Firmness and Flexibility

Legal experts warn against eliminating suspended sentences without preserving judges’ ability to individualize punishment. Darmanin suggests maintaining judicial discretion by allowing exceptions where judges can justify deviating from minimum sentences. The debate echoes the “minimum sentencing” laws introduced under Nicolas Sarkozy in 2007, whose limited effectiveness was largely attributed to their rigid application.